Reviewed by Richard Toogood
Neither Sergeant Samuel Quick nor Professor Ptolemy Higgs are to be found in William Freeman’s DICTIONARY OF FICTIONAL CHARACTERS. At least not in the 1963 edition which is my resource of first resort in reference to such matters. Whether they succeeded in making it into any later issue I am not in a position to know. But I rather doubt it. And this seems to me a sorry omission as each is in his own way a memorable creation which deserves to be better known.
Quick is yeoman stock out of old England; stolid, modest, sensible, loyal and dependable: the sort of man whose ancestors stood ruminatively in the Saxon shield wall at Hastings. Stalwart working class characters of this type are commonplace in popular fiction of the Imperial Era. Haggard’s achievement was to invest this stereotype with personality which finds expression in a droll disdain for pomposity: “Shut it, porpoise…and keep your eyes where Nature put ‘em, or they’ll fall out”. Equally delightful is Quick’s phlegmatic fatalism: “Begging your pardon, Captain, there ain’t no such thing as risk. Man comes here when he must, and dies when he must, and what he does between don’t make a ha’porth of difference.” Part comic foil and part moral yardstick, against which the failings and foibles of his betters are measured, Quick illuminates every page on which he appears with his repertoire of dry observations.
Ptolemy Higgs, by contrast, is a stereotype of a different sort: the eccentric expert. In this instance an archaeologist reputed to be one of the foremost authorities on extinct languages in Europe. But at the same time a man so unconcerned with his mode of attire that it was said “the police invariably request him to move on, should he loiter in the streets at night”. Shrill, irascible and often reckless Higgs appears to have directly inspired the creation of Conan Doyle’s Professor Challenger. Furthermore his recourse to a whip of rhinoceros hide against his detractors might be said to have informed another famous fictional archaeologist as well.
The abiding pity is that two such sterling and scintillating characters could not be found a place in one of Rider Haggard’s better books. First published in 1910 by the firm of Eveleigh Nash [significantly not one of Haggard’s usual publishers] QUEEN SHEBA’S RING dates to the middle years of Rider Haggard’s career which few would advocate as being his best. The masterpieces he had regularly produced during the 1880s and 90s were long behind him, whilst the remorseless exploitation of Allan Quatermain, which would commence with the publication of MARIE in 1912, was still to come.
Looking at the books Rider Haggard published in this period there is an inescapable sense of revisiting tried and trusted territory, be that on account of the belated resurrection of She-Who-Must-be-Obeyed in AYESHA (1905), the recycling of the same geographical settings with PEARL MAIDEN (1903) and THE BRETHREN (1904) or the repetitious employment of colonial Africa which he knew intimately. One can but speculate whether other commitments at this time – of which he had many – precluded him from undertaking the field trips to new locations which invested his stories with authenticity.
QUEEN SHEBA’S RING is one of those signature tales of Africa with which Rider Haggard’s name will always be indelibly associated. In this instance the setting is sub Saharan central Africa instead of the more customary Transvaal. The narrator of the tale is an ex-pat doctor called Richard Adams who is on a mission to find his kidnapped son. Years of fruitless searching eventually bring him into the remote lands of the savage Fung people where the son is found enslaved. Attacked by the Fung Adams finds sanctuary in the mountain city of a lost tribe of Abyssinian Jews called the Abati. The Abati are ruled over by Maqueda, aka Walda Nagasta, the Child of Kings, another graduate from Rider Haggard’s inexhaustible academy of impossibly beautiful queens. Although the Abati prove to be a wholly degenerate, debased and spineless rabble Adams bargains their aid in rescuing his son in exchange for recruiting experts from England to undertake the task of destroying Harmac, the monumental black sphinx which the Fung worship as a god. For there is a prophecy that the Fung will depart the land and cease to menace the Abati should their idol be obliterated.
It is this set of circumstances which serves to bring both Higgs and Quick into the story, along with a rather bland hero by the name of Oliver Orme who has the role of besotted love interest impressed upon him from the off. From this point forward events progress along fairly routine lines. The requisite quota of diversions includes a lion hunt, a sandstorm and a fire fight with the Fung before Adams and company succeed in reaching their destination. Whereupon an infatuated Orme and Maqueda engage in a romance in defiance of custom which incurs the enmity of the Abati and threatens to bring disaster down upon the entire enterprise.
It isn’t a bad premise by any means but it smacks of a tale written with the left hand instead of the right which was Kipling’s way of criticizing stories that lacked the full force of authorial commitment. And it must be said that the book springs very few surprises. In fact it is possible to glean a pretty accurate impression of the entire story from the chapter titles alone.
The reader’s expectations appertaining to the aforementioned heroic romance are addressed even in a manner which hints at authorial self-parody. For having all declared themselves to be “past that sort of thing” Quick observes that “woman is just the one thing about which you can never be sure” and speculates, prophetically as it transpires, that they may all live to “see [Orme] crawling after this one on [his] knees, with the gent in the specs behind, and Samuel Quick, who hates the whole tribe of them, bringing up the rear.”
The book suffers too from a degree of artifice and contrivance which, while it is only to be expected in a story of this nature, in this instance strains credulity on more than one occasion. Possibly the most glaring example of this occurs when the Fung choose to attack the gates of their own city instead of making use of the alternative entrance by which Orme, Adams and Quick blundered into it.
Readers familiar with the works of Rider Haggard will not be surprised to learn that the savage Fung are written about in admiring terms whereas the venal and cowardly Abati are relentlessly pilloried in a manner which strays alarmingly close to outright anti-Semitism.
In compensation for this the book does provide one of those marvellous images in which Rider Haggard excelled and for which Graham Greene credited him with the ability to enchant; in this case the spectacle of a hunchbacked skeleton ensconced upon a throne, surrounded by treasure and washed by firelight. If the image resonates then it is probably because it was appropriated by that notorious literary magpie Lin Carter, by which route it eventually found worldwide exposure in John Milius’s Conan the Barbarian (1982).
For my money Rider Haggard was, and always will be, the greatest adventure story writer of them all, and one mediocre offering will not impact upon that assessment in the slightest. When one considers that he wrote in a period which bequeathed such an abundance of ideas and characters to posterity, from Long John Silver to Sherlock Holmes, the Psammead to the Martian tripods, – and upon which films, television and comics have been ravenously feeding ever since – Rider Haggard’s sheer creativity and influence yet elevates him above all his peers. Without him there would be no Tarzan, no Conan, and no Indiana Jones. His shadow even extends to Star Trek where the Kirk, Spock and McCoy triumvirate is a direct parallel with the tripartite protagonist formula he pioneered in KING SOLOMON’S MINES. With the statuses of Orme, Higgs and Adams being that of soldier, scientist and medical man respectively the comparisons in this instance could not be any more direct.
QUEEN SHEBA’S RING is not a bad book by any means. If it does disappoint then it is only in comparison with Rider Haggard’s other works to which it surrenders both depth and richness. But it remains eminently readable and entertaining even so. And sometimes it pays those of us who persist in claiming profundity for popular culture to remember that that is all it was ever intended to be.
Leave a Reply